Skip to content
Greenknight
  • Home
  • Services
    • Resource efficiency
    • Strategy
    • Stakeholder alignment
    • Materiality & risk
    • Audit and review
    • UN SDGs
    • Engaging people
    • Supply chain
    • Consortium building
    • Conferences and Events
    • Chairing and facilitation
  • About
    • Associate organisations
    • Publications
  • Contacts
  • Blog
  • Testimonials

COP out?

Yes, I know other people will have used the same title, but it’s too apt not to.

The COP24 meeting in Katowice finally lurched to something of a conclusion, perhaps best described as an agreement to have an agreement, rather than an agreement in itself. The can was kicked down the road for another 12 months as national fossil fuel interests again held back climate progress. This wasn’t all that surprising, as 4 countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia and, most disappointingly, the USA) had already prevented the conference formally adopting the fairly apocalyptic IPCC report commissioned as one of the major outputs of COP21 in Paris, a meeting which seemed so positive at the time. All this as atmospheric concentrations of CO2 continue to rise.

But it’s not all bad news, even though the silver lining is thin and weak, and the cloud is black and stormy. Some private fossil fuel interests are more progressive, including Shell, which had already called for the UK’s ban on combustion engines to be brought forward and announced plans to reduce the carbon impact of its operations including by reducing methane emissions. Added to this is a scheme of a sort which isn’t all that common even outside the fossil fuel sector. Senior executives at the company will have their reward packages linked to the company’s progress against these aims and performance will be independently audited. Of course, fossil fuel has been the biggest contributor to the current mess, and the likelihood of future carbon taxes is a powerful incentive for change in companies like Shell, but we won’t be able to solve our current problems without them changing and so such engagement should be supported.

There are positives in the UK as well, despite the huge governmental resources being expended on ‘Brexit’. The UK and other countries are looking to go further and in October the Scottish, Welsh and Westminster governments jointly approached the independent Committee on Climate Change for advice on how it should set about achieving full decarbonisation. The CCC’s response is due by the end of March 2019 and it will be instructive to see how any recommendations fit alongside events in the EU, which is targeting a net-zero economy by 2050. Business is playing a part here too, with individual business leaders calling on politicians to move faster, and investment organisations incorporating climate considerations in their lending and investment decisions. In the grocery sector, Tesco has announced a partnership with WWF with the very ambitious goal of halving the environmental impact of their customers’ shopping basket. It remains to be seen how this will be measured and evidenced, but it is a step in the right direction.

Regular readers of this blog will recall that at this time last year I mentioned a book called Drawdown which sets out a series of actions which could be taken globally to manage the climate challenge. The agri-food system features strongly, with meat consumption and land-use change among the most significant contributors. Independently of the call for advice mentioned above, the CCC has also recommended a reduction in red meat consumption of between 20 and 50%. Ruminants produce methane in their digestive tract (contrary to the urban myth, it is actually emitted through their mouths), which is a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and are very inefficient converters of the nutrition in the plants they eat into nutrition in meat. If course, not all nutrients are available from plants and many people rely on livestock farming for their livelihoods, so large-scale change must be handled with care. As the Macron government has just found out, leaving people behind in these big decisions can have disastrous impacts which can set back the overall goal as well as individual actions within it.

As private citizens, it is ultimately our actions which will make the difference. Responsible consumption is the key, and our purchasing decisions will drive the actions of primary production, processing and retail. Omnivores can cut down on their consumption of meat, especially red meat. Vegetarians can cut down on their consumption of dairy products (dairy cattle burp methane too, after all). People in business can make more use of conference-call technology in place of physical travel and we can all drive less. We can offset the emissions from flights when we go on holiday, and if we have gardens big enough, we can plant our own trees. We can reward businesses that do the right thing by giving them more of our custom. If you’re the type of person who makes New Year resolutions, maybe these are things you’ve already thought of doing. If you want to know more about the carbon impact of consumption you could do worse than take a look at a book called ‘How Bad Are Bananas?’ by Mike Berners-Lee which explains it in a very accessible fashion. I don’t have any association with the authors or publishers of either of these books, by the way, they just provide a great way in to the subject.

PRIME factors
2018 And All That

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ethical Corp newsfeed

  • Society Watch: Drive to make ecocide an international crime gains momentum

    Ecocide is an emotive word. First used to describe the human and environmental devastation caused by the use of the defoliant Agent Orange during the Vietnam War, it became the subject of regular discussions at the United Nations throughout the 1970s. In 1998, the destruction of the environment was proposed as an international crime against peace, but ultimately wasn’t adopted as part of the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) Rome Statute, which includes genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression.Image: Channels: Climate and EnergyNatural CapitalTags: Stop ecocide internationalInternational Criminal CourtRome statuteEU Environmental Crime Directive

GreenBiz newsfeed

  • Building the Circular Buildings Revolution
    on April 20, 2023 at 7:15 am

    Join GreenBiz for our conversation covering the approaches building product manufacturers are using to make products more circular and keep materials in play after their first use. The idea of buildings as material banks is not new, but deserves examination as it hasn’t taken hold at the scale we would expect.

Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT